ops oimrqs ops

Synthetic proof-of-process

Figma design into editable WordPress, with institutional fidelity intact.

This public demo shows how a supplied institutional layout can become a responsive WordPress build: desktop and mobile fidelity, design-token checks, editable sections, portfolio/project CMS fields, image QA and acceptance gates. It is not a client case and does not use private Figma files.

check editability map open acceptance gates
handoff
Figma tokens -> WP blocks
surface
institutional + projects
QA
desktop / mobile / CWV
institutional preview

designed in Figma

Clean institutional page with editable service and project sections.

hero image crop
01 Reusable service block
02 Portfolio/project cards
03 Editor-safe image ratios
mobile 390 same hierarchy, no squeezed sections

Design fidelity checklist

The build starts by translating the design system, not by guessing CSS.

A WordPress implementation should preserve the visual language a buyer already approved in Figma: type scale, spacing, colors, image treatments, card geometry and responsive behavior.

Color and contrast

Background, surfaces, accent states and text contrast are mapped before page building starts.

Typography rhythm

H1/H2/body/caption sizes, line heights and responsive breaks are documented as tokens.

Spacing and grids

Desktop columns, mobile stacking, gutters and section padding are checked against the source layout.

Subtle motion limits

Reveal animation stays lightweight, optional and respectful of reduced-motion preferences.

WordPress editability map

Pixel fidelity is not enough if the buyer cannot edit the site safely.

The implementation plan separates fixed design rules from editable WordPress content so the site can be maintained without breaking the Figma-approved structure.

Locked design layer

  • global type scale and color tokens
  • hero and section spacing rules
  • card radius, media crop and button states
  • responsive menu and footer structure

Editable content layer

  • page headlines and body sections
  • services, team, FAQ and institution facts
  • portfolio/project cards and category labels
  • SEO title, meta description and image alt text

Portfolio / projects CMS model

Institutional sites often fail when projects become a hardcoded gallery.

This proof models projects as repeatable WordPress content so the buyer can add portfolio items without rebuilding templates.

Project title Plain text field

Length guard keeps cards aligned on desktop and mobile.

Featured image Aspect-ratio crop

Editor preview checks 16:10 and mobile crop before publish.

Category / sector Taxonomy chips

Reusable filters without changing layout components.

Outcome summary Short rich text

Buyer-facing summary with no fake testimonial or revenue claim.

Performance and image QA

The final handoff is a checklist the buyer can actually inspect.

Figma-to-WordPress delivery should leave evidence: responsive snapshots, image compression rules, content edit checks, Core Web Vitals targets and browser QA notes.

01

Responsive fidelity

Desktop, tablet and mobile snapshots show that hierarchy, spacing and project cards survive real breakpoints.

02

Image pipeline

Hero and project images get crop rules, alt text, lazy loading and compressed exports before publish.

03

Editor pass

Change a headline, service card and project entry in WordPress, then verify the front end still matches the system.

04

Performance gates

Check LCP image treatment, CLS stability, font loading, unused scripts and mobile Lighthouse deltas.

Use boundaries

When MAIN or PROSPECTOR can use this proof.

Use this link for buyers asking for an institutional WordPress site from a supplied Figma design, especially when they mention visual fidelity, responsive polish, editable portfolio/projects or WordPress handoff.